NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson, writing on National Review Online, takes Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus to task for promoting abortion lobby’s line that the Capps Amendment is a “compromise” that preserves a careful balance on federal abortion policy. Johnson writes: “One of the biggest whoppers of the summer is the argument that the Capps Amendment to the Obama-backed health-care bill (an amendment that was actually written by pro-abortion champion Rep. Henry Waxman and his veteran staff) represents a ‘compromise.’ A meeting of the minds between Planned Parenthood (which loves the Capps Amendment) and the congressman from West Hollywood is not likely to be much of a compromise, and this one is as phony as they come. The Capps Amendment, if enacted, would insert the federal government into the abortion-funding business in two very big ways, both of which would mark sharp breaks from longstanding federal policy.” Read the entire essay here.
- RT @CarolTobias1: Wouldn’t You Want to Know if Your Underage Daughter was Having an Abortion? bit.ly/2akIMXf 6 hours ago
- Dismemberment abortions tear a living unborn baby limb from limb. This must end: bit.ly/2ahVLiE #prolife https://t.co/I0ByurwWMG 22 hours ago
- Conscientious Objection, Conscience Rights and Workplace Discrimination: bit.ly/2ahCyZD https://t.co/kdTHz5g7Ev 23 hours ago